Lawyers can use AI to do things as some students do. They can use AI to search for information about the roles of some organizations, members, and member authorities, in their organization. The AI can also search for precedents about similar cases and the AI can also search cases that certain judges handled.
Same way. AI can search for things like blogs that jurors wrote. That thing tells about their attitudes about cases. And, of course, important data is also what the media tells about cases. So the AI can search, sort, and give links to the stories. That people write about the case or similar cases. Another thing that the AI can tell is how long time the judge or lawyers use for data about the case.
If the lawyer will not even check the files about the case, that tells something about that person's attitude. And the ability to work as a lawyer. Same way. Judges and other people can see how many similar cases the lawyer handled before. The AI can also see if the witness starts to speak louder, or maybe do some other things that tell about lies. The AI can mark those points in the recordings.
The person who reads body language can see those points and maybe use still images and zooms to see if a person touches their nose at the wrong moment. Some people cover those things using strong movement. And the zoom image might uncover those signs better than normal tape. The other thing is that AI can also record if the specialist doesn't use the rewind button and the tools. That they should use.
The AI can also see if the lawyer has shown marks to the witness or given something to them. And of course, AI can check answers like: does a person has a registered firearm, is that firearm reported as stolen? Or missing, etc. AI is a good tool for working as an assistant. It shows does the conviction follows the line that judges normally use. And it can see if there are some anomalies in argumentations.
https://www.freethink.com/artificial-intelligence/how-ai-is-reshaping-the-legal-profession
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti