Black holes. And gravitational quantum effect.

Can the Aether and Higgs field be the same thing? 

When researchers talk about things like the Higgs field. That is the base energy level in the universe. We can say that they talk about Aetherium. The energy field that carries the wave movement. 

In the past. Physicists believe. That there is some kind of energy field in the universe. 

That field carries information. The thing that supports this model is that wave movement cannot move in a total vacuum. There must be some field where the wave can travel. 

Without a field. There are no changes in energy levels. And we cannot see the field if we are in it. We can only see the changes in the power of the field. Electromagnetic and other waves are only the changes in the power of the field. 

The idea is that there is some kind of energy field where information travels. Famous physicist Albert Abraham Michelson named that field "Aether". When we think about Albert Abraham Michelson. And his "Aether". That is "proven wrong". 

We must realize. Some people talking about the same thing. Even if. They use different names for the substance. 

Could the Higgs field? Or the base energy field in the universe. Same as this mythic aether? So did Higgs and Michelson talk about the same thing? The Higgs field is the medium where information travels.

 And that explains many things about black holes and gravitation. 

Black holes are such extreme objects that we cannot find similar things from anywhere else. There is no top limit for those monster's mass, but there is no minimum mass for black holes. That means there can be miniature black holes even in your room.  The String Theory goes like this. The quantum-size black holes make the gravitational tornadoes or tunnels through the Higgs field. And then those energy tornadoes turn around extremely small black holes. Forming the elementary particles. 

Sometimes. things like ghosts are explained the tiny black hole brings information from the past or some other place. The idea is that the quantum-size black hole is in every single elementary particle. When black holes spin they bound energy into them. 

But when we think about the gravitational effect there is a possibility that there are two types of gravitation. When black holes spin very fast that thing causes the macro-scale tornado in the Higgs field. And that macro-scale tornado would be a so-called wormhole. 

When we think about things like gravitational engines they must make some kind of hole in the gravitational field. And if gravitation is an effect in the Higgs field that makes them possible. Those engines must make a tunnel through the energy fields. 

And one of those energy fields is the gravitational field. Theoretically, fast-spinning particles can make energy tornado. That is needed for that thing. But it's possible. The only thing that can turn the gravitation into the roll is the black hole. 

That quantum low-pressure pulls the craft into it. The gravitational engines just make the hole into some energy field and then that makes those things move. 

Einstein is invincible. (Einstein’s General Relativity holds firm)

"Einstein’s General Relativity holds firm as DESI data confirms its predictions on cosmic scales, while also revealing new insights into neutrino masses and galaxy clustering. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Einstein Vindicated: Stunning Cosmic Map Confirms Gravity Theory Across Billions of Years)

Einstein's greatest idea was that gravity is the attribute in the spacetime. That means the other three fundamental interactions are things that we can describe as the attributes in spacetime. Spacetime is the Higgs field that determines the base energy level in the Universe. 

We can say that Einstein keeps his place. The Theory of Relativity. The gravity models were tested on the Universe scale. And there are no mistakes. That means gravity was similar in the young universe as it is in the modern universe. The difference in energy levels and size of the young and modern universe can explain differences in the measurements. The young universe was denser and its energy level was higher. That means the energy pushed particles away from each other stronger than in the modern universe. 

The term "visible energy" means...

<>Four fundamental forces. 

-Strong nuclear force

-Weak nuclear force

-Electromagnetism

-Gravity (or gravitation) 

E = mc2—In SI units, the energy E is measured in Joules, the mass m is measured in kilograms, and the speed of light is measured in metres per second.

<>Electromagnetic spectrum. 

-Radiowaves

-Infrared radiation

-Visible light

-X-rays 

-Gamma rays

Dark energy is the mysterious wave movement whose origin is unknown.

Dark matter means mysterious gravitational fields or gravitational effects that the source is unknown. Sometimes people believe that the Maser effect in gravitational waves can explain dark matter. Or the dark matter is some kind of hole in Higgs field. The question is not what makes the mass or black holes. The question is what puts the Higgs field moving? The moving field is the thing that makes gravity waves. 

As we see from the diagram only 4,9% of the material is visible. As we see from the electromagnetic spectrum most "visible" radiation or energy requires special equipment. So that nobody can observe those wavelengths. 

The distance between objects was shorter. And that means the energy interaction was stronger. The question is did dark energy is released in the same event as visible energy is the big question. But in a dense and. young universe the visible energy had also stronger interactions than in the modern universe. 

And that energy also pushes objects away from each other. Even if we say that dark energy is the dominant effect in the modern universe, we must realize that in the young universe, the relations between visible and dark energy are different. 

When we think that dark energy is the same as dark matter we can imagine the wave-particle duality. The wave-particle duality is the thing. That makes material. That happens when wave fields cross each other. And the Schwinger effect forms the particles. It forms the particle-antiparticle pair. The idea is that the energy beam travels through across the other quantum field. 

That forms two whirls that turn into quark-antiquark pairs. So that means the particles are one packed form of energy. Dark energy should form particles as well as visible energy. But nobody is sure that theoretical material is dark or invisible to us. If that model is true, we can say that dark energy is behind weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs. 

The thing is. Researchers believe that the so-called Higgs field makes the mass of all particles. The idea is in that model the Higgs Boson or something like that makes the Higgs field move into the objects. The question is where that Higgs field goes when it moves to the objects. That is an interesting question. The mass and gravity are things that make the Higgs field move. At that point everything is clear. But the direction. Where that field moves is the problem. What denies that we will not turn into black holes? 

In models, the Higgs boson is the thing that makes the mass. That mass forms when Higgs boson vaporizes. And then Higgs field tries to fill that space. The problem is that. Can there be material that has no Higgs boson? And can the photon be the particle that has no Higgs boson in it? 

If something causes too fast vaporization in the Higgs boson. That means the movement in the Higgs field will stop. That means the material would lose its mass. 

In that model, cosmic inflation means. That particles biding Higgs field into themselves. That means that the Higgs field turns thinner but also there are more denser points. So others say the Higgs field accumulates in other points and then turns thinner or lower energy between those points. 

But those things are still fully theoretical things. We know that a particle is one model of energy. Gravity is the attribute in the spacetime. That means the other three fundamental interactions are things that we can describe as the attributes in spacetime. As I wrote at the beginning of this text. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/youre-made-of-energy-the-strange-truth-about-where-mass-comes-from/

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/dark-matter-same-dark-energy/

https://home.cern/science/physics/higgs-boson

https://scitechdaily.com/einstein-vindicated-stunning-cosmic-map-confirms-gravity-theory-across-billions-of-years/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence

Researchers created the image of individual photons.

"A new theory, that explains how light and matter interact at the quantum level has enabled researchers to define for the first time the precise shape of a single photon. Credit: Dr. Benjamin Yuen" (ScitechDaily, Quantum Leap: Scientists Reveal the Shape of a Single Photon for the First Time)

The new quantum leap is interesting. Researchers observed the single photon for the first time. The photons structure can tell researchers,  why that strange particle can act like particles with mass. But there is no measured mass in the photon. That means photons should not have the ability to carry energy or information or make quantum entanglements with other photons. 

The image of a single photon makes it possible to control that strange particle, which is the only particle that can reach the speed of light. The image of the photon introduces a structure that looks like a little bit of benzene or a peanut. The shape of a photon can tell why a photon can reach energy stability. That means while a photon travels, it gets as much energy as it releases. 

We can put a presumption that the image of a photon can unveil the mysterious and still hypothetical graviton, the transmitter particle of gravitation. The ring-shaped structure is similar to the ring around stars and other gravitational centers. So could the photon be an electromagnetic field or superstring that orbits the graviton? 

That means. It's possible. That graviton exists. If that wheel-shaped superstring harvests energy from around it, that thing could send wave movement into the middle of that wheel. The idea is that those superstrings are not the same size. And when that photon travels in quantum fields it sends energy as well as around it. And to the middle of it. That can form a stylus-looking structure. 

In some models, photons travel around superstrings. That means the photon would be a quantum skyrmion that is formed around those superstrings. The theoretical superstring is the gravitational or quantum tornado that forms a channel through the universe. That formation makes strings through the Higgs field. 

That means there is a vacuum in that structure that allows particles can travel faster than in a normal Higgs field. The energy comes to the particle backward and. from sides. In some models, a graviton is a quasiparticle that forms at the entrance of the superstring. 

And maybe that thing slows the photon's speed. Or maybe the electromagnetic low pressure will pull the photon´s structure backward. That vacuum or void would deny the photon's acceleration to a speed that is faster than the speed of light. 

So if we try to use that model with another still hypothetical, faster-than-light particle called tachyon, we can think that maybe that tachyon is the particle that looks like omega. When the tachyon crosses the speed of light, the back side of it travels forward, because there is an electromagnetic vacuum in that structure. That thing sends the wave movement or energy strike through that quantum low-pressure. And when that thing hits the tachyon. That pushes it faster-than-light speed. 

The knowledge of the shape of the photons is the thing that allows to creation of new communication tools. Those quantum communication tools are the systems that allow to create the single-photon-based communication systems. In those systems. The shape of the photon determines the state of that particle. 

And if the system can control the shape of the photon, that allows to creation of new and powerful technologies and ultra-secured data transmissions that are in the shape of the photon. The shape of the photon can be like an image. In macro-scale systems, the image like a cross or wave can mean some letter, or they can mean zero and one. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-leap-scientists-reveal-the-shape-of-a-single-photon-for-the-first-time/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

The universe's dark second origin is unveiled.

"Dark matter may have sprung from its own “Dark Big Bang,” separate from the traditional Big Bang, with potential proof coming from future experiments detecting gravitational waves. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab, edited" (ScitechDaily, The Dark Big Bang: Unveiling the Universe’s Hidden Second Origin)

It's possible. That dark matter is the shadows in the Higgs field. But we cannot be sure about that. 

The evidence that the universe did not begin from one event is stronger. That means that the Big Bang was a series of events that included many forms and energy levels before the material and energy formed. The dark Big Bang is the model that there were material before the universe. The dark Big Bang means that the dark matter is released in its own event. And that is one of the most interesting theories in the world. If the dark matter formed in a different, unique event that means it would be hard to see that material even if it's similar to visible material. 

The reason for that is that the dark matter particles or their elementary particle size will be different from than visible material. That means the wavelength that the dark matter particles send would be different than the wavelengths that we see. The different origin of the dark matter is one of the ways how to close that mysterious interaction. The young universe was different than the modern universe. The temperature of that universe was higher. And differences between energy levels were lower than in the modern universe. 

That means the energy flow from higher energy levels was slower and that means in the very young universe other fermions than just up and down quarks and electrons could form "stable" particles. The thing is that the muons and top and bottom quarks should have the ability to form "similar" particles as up and down quarks and electrons. The fast energy flow destroys those structures in the modern universe. But in a very high-energy environment that kind of hypothetical material could be possible. But that cannot happen in the modern universe because of the short existence of those particles. That material requires higher energy and more stable conditions. 

The sombrero model tells how gravity destroys the material. A standing gravity wave surrounds all particles. That gravity wave is the low energy area around particles or other gravity centers. If the differences between the particle's energy level and the bottom of the energy ditch around the particle are high enough, energy travels out from from particle so fast that it destroys it. 

When we think of models that gravity destroys the universe or all matter from inside it, we can think that the gravity ditch or gravity wave surrounds all particles. The gravity wave or lower energy area that forms the ditch around particles is the thing, that causes energy flow in it. The energy travels from outside and another energy wave comes from the particle inside that "sombrero". 

If the standing gravity wave or pothole is too deep particle vanishes into it. If we make a model where energy travels to that particle from above, that thing can cause reflection that covers the gravitation or energy pothole. Just like water that creates a roof-like form when we aim water dush to peg straight from above. The problem is that if the gravitational pothole is deep enough that causes a situation where energy travels out from the particle very fast. 

That thing rips their structure immediately. So can gravitation be the negative energy?  The idea is that. Negative energy is the energy that travels away from a particle. And the energy that travels into particles is positive energy. The determinator is in the energy flow direction. If the gravity wave is a lower energy point in the base energy field in the universe that means gravity itself or the energy flow that gravity causes is the negative energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-dark-big-bang-unveiling-the-universes-hidden-second-origin/