Quantum entanglements and human consciousness.

Researchers noticed that human brains emit light. That very weak light that very sensitive sensors see is the thing that causes interesting ideas and thoughts. The fact is that we know that there is nothing meaningless in human brains. And that strange light must have some connection to brain activity. The question is can part of our thoughts be based on quantum entanglement between some electric or photonic field in human brains? 

The human brains have the capacity to feel magnetic fields because axons transport electric signals. The question is what parts in our brain make that entanglement? Do neurons trap ions like protons into the ion pumps and then make quantum entanglement with them? There is suspicion that the myelin cylinders are the key element in the brain's quantum entanglement. 

If that structure is the thing, that is behind the human brain's superiority it would be the ultimate boost for quantum computing. Researchers can copy that structure into the quantum processors. And make room-temperature quantum computers possible. 

The quantum entanglement can be made between axons or electric fields around axons. We know that human brains will not make anything that it doesn’t need. And the thing is that the very weak light in brains can have its purpose in the thinking process. There is also another interesting thing that researchers noticed. The human brain cells are growing in old age. The memory cells make new neurons all the time. The reason why our cognitive abilities decrease when we turn older is that our brains lose more neurons than they can replace. 

"Liu et al., Physical Review E, 2024

"A closer look at myelin cylinders and its location along the neuron’s axon." (Popular mechanics, Quantum Entanglement in Your Brain Is What Generates Consciousness, Radical Study Suggests)

The finding of the thing. That makes superposition in human brains. Can uncover and supercharge the quantum computer's advance. 

Or neurons start to remove connections faster than before. The destructive thing is that the number of axon connections will decrease so fast that brains cannot adapt to that situation. Our brains simply don't have time to transport memories to the next neuron generation. So do we use our brains less in middle age than in young ages? Do our brains cut so many useless axon connections that they cannot save memories? 

But the problem with alcoholism and some other brain damage caused is that those things destroy brain cells faster than the new brain cells can form. When the memory cell creates a new brain cell, that cell is meaningless without its memories. Brain damage sometimes means that the brain memory neurons have no time to send the memories to those cells. That makes them "empty". 

If those neurons exist they cannot perform the same duties as their precursors can. The cell loses its instructions on how it must make those things. Without those memory units, the neuron cannot do anything. The ability to create new neurons in the old ages makes it theoretically possible to input data, or “train” those new cells and then inject them into human brains. 

The big question is does AI make us less intelligent than our precursors were? The thing is that if a person uses lots of AI the person uses less brain capacity than a person who uses less AI if we think about the neurological aspect, if brains do not use some neural tracks that means that neurons remove those tracks. So if a person writes all texts and draws all things using the AI that can decrease the use of axons and that can decrease the IQ if that happens over a long period. When a person doesn’t use neural tracks that means brains will remove those tracks. 

When people use artificial intelligence for essays they must not think. They must not collect information and the main thing is that they must not process that data. The AI will give them a correct set. And that doesn't give them a chance to process and taste information. In the worst case, the student simply copy-paste the test task to AI. And that makes the essay for them. That doesn't require very much thinking. And in that version, the student cannot advance very much. 

So that means that it’s necessary that people use their brains for thinking. Without thinking, brains disconnect their connections. People say that we should read books and advance our way of thinking. But the problem is this: we have no time to read. 

https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/06/21/using-ai-bots-like-chatgptcould-be-causing-cognitive-decline-new-study-shows

https://www.laptopmag.com/ai/chatgpt-study-by-mit

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65368553/quantum-entanglement-in-brain-consciousness/

 https://www.sciencealert.com/your-brain-emits-a-secret-light-that-scientists-are-trying-to-read

B https://scitechdaily.com/brain-cells-keep-growing-even-in-old-age-study-finds/

Green energy and hydrogen economy.

Things like windmills or wind generators can bring energy to systems that separate hydrogen from seawater. The same electrolytic system that breaks water molecules can also form chlorine and sodium. The other thing that the windmills or wind generators can involve is the radar system. The radar system can also be installed in the wing of the wind generators. That system can have some civil and military applications. 

And in the most futuristic visions, sea-based wind generators can also operate as laser stations. The laser system can be at the foot of the wind generator. And that kind of system can be a very powerful tool. The large carbon dioxide laser that is hidden in the wind generator can be used to destroy even ships by cutting their hulls. 

The hydrogen economy should be the goal for energy. Hydrogen is a fuel that can use existing energy infrastructure.  We all know that hydrogen is easy to get. The green energy and nuclear power can be used to create electrolysis that splits water molecules. But the fact is this. The main problem is the energy that splits water molecules. And another thing is that hydrogen that is created or separated from water doesn’t help with things like greenhouse gasses. 

There are two ways to make pure hydrogen. 

1) The most well-known thing is to separate it from water. The electrolytic system just splits water molecules. 

2) The other way is to split hydrocarbon molecules into carbon and hydrogen. 

If the system filters or otherwise breaks the methane molecules into hydrogen and carbon that removes the greenhouse gas from air. And that decreases methane emissions. The first way to remove carbon is simply to use an active carbon filter. And the other one is to use IR light that gives resonance to the methane molecule. 

The system can simply use centrifugal separation to separate hydrogen and carbon from each other after the system splits the hydrocarbon molecule. In the same way, IR light can separate and break the carbon dioxide molecules. The active carbon filter should also remove oxygen from carbon dioxide molecules. 

The main problem with hydrogen production is that these kinds of systems require money. Another thing is that those windmills and other things change the landscape. And the third thing is that some eagles fly into the wind generators' wings. An interesting thing is that no eagle ever flew in the aircraft's turbine. But because people see that one eagle flies against the wind generator's wings. 

That makes them resist the wind energy. People don't see that thousands of eagle chicks die because of thirst and heat in forests.  They see that the one eagle smashed into the wings of the wind generator. And that makes that system dangerous. The fact is that if we think about how the electricity should be pumped to the electric network we should never put electricity straight into those electric networks. 

The system requires a battery system. That helps to keep the voltage stable on cloudy days if the system uses solar panels. Or calm, in the case of wind energy. And another thing is that. The system must not be based on one monolith solution. The system should have multiple systems. That produces electricity even if there are calm days. The battery platforms between the power unit and network help to avoid situations that cause electric cuts in southern Europe. 

The worst possible situation could be that the solar panels will not produce enough energy. That means that other systems must increase their power to maintain the voltage. Then if energy production suddenly starts again. That causes an overload in the network. That is more dangerous than the low voltage situations. 

Mathematics, geometry, and quantum.

In the image in this text is an image of lupine and image of a quantum experiment there is tested Landrauer's principle. “Landauer's principle is a physical principle pertaining to a lower theoretical limit of energy consumption of computation. It holds that an irreversible change in information stored in a computer, such as merging two computational paths, dissipates a minimum amount of heat to its surroundings. It is hypothesized that energy consumption below this lower bound would require the development of reversible computing. The principle was first proposed by Rolf Landauer in 1961.” (Wikipedia, Landauer's principle)

Both the flower and those quantum fields form the tower. And the remarkable thing is that those quantum fields form a similar structure as a series of coils that send radiation from their sides. That kind of quantum tower can send information to the receiving coils or layers if they are against each other. Same way a radio antenna transmits information from the points where the Hall effect forms the plate-shaped expansion into the electromagnetic (quantum) field between atoms. 

"Quantum magnetometers are breaking barriers in magnetic sensing — but are they really quantum? A new study digs into how far these devices can go and what defines their quantum nature. Credit: SciTechDaily.com"(ScitechDaily, Quantum Sensors That Hear Magnetic Whispers – And Push Physics to Its Limit). Those sensors could form a tower that can scan quite a large area. 

Quantum magnetometers can detect incredibly small changes in magnetic fields by tapping into the strange and powerful features of quantum physics. These devices rely on the discrete nature and coherence of quantum particles—behaviors that give them a major edge over classical sensors. But how far can their sensitivity go? And what actually makes a magnetometer “quantum?” (ScitechDaily, Quantum Sensors That Hear Magnetic Whispers – And Push Physics to Its Limit)

Those fields form when an electromagnetic wave travels between atoms.  When that wave hits an atom's quantum field it causes a wave. That wave or resistance makes it possible that the system can press information into the sides of the antenna.  When we think about those Hall fields and those flowers, we can imagine a situation where those flowers could send chemical signals from their flowers to another flower. That thing is not proven. But the lupine flowers can act as models for directed radio transmitters that send coherent radio signals to the receiver. 

The second image introduces the model of the quantum fields around quantum sensors. Those quantum fields allow those sensors to sense things that were unable to detect before. When we think about things like quantum computers, erasing information is also important. If we can trap wave movement into the bubble, we can erase that information by pressing wave movement into a straight position. 

We can see that the same forms repeat in nature. The image from the Landrauer’s principle has a similar form with flowering plants. And that causes an interesting question. Can we someday calculate things like quantum fields' form in situations where some high-power energy impulse hits them. If we think that the quantum tower is similar in all sizes of quantum systems, we can make the new types of quantum systems that are more sensitive than ever before.  

There is a possibility that the quantum sensor looks like the quantum tower where the electrons or photons hover between objects and those quantum fields. When we make superposition and entanglement we must know everything from the system. We must predict things like FRBs and other changes in the power of electromagnetic fields. 

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-approach-probing-landauer-principle-quantum.html

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-sensors-that-hear-magnetic-whispers-and-push-physics-to-its-limit/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-quantum-price-of-forgetting-scientists-finally-measure-the-energy-cost-of-deleting-information/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_effect

Can the fifth force hide in neutrons?

 

"In physics, a fifth force refers to a hypothetical fundamental interaction (also known as fundamental force) beyond the four known interactions in nature: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear forces. Some speculative theories have proposed a fifth force to explain various anomalous observations that do not fit existing theories. The specific characteristics of a putative fifth force depend on which hypothesis is being advanced. No evidence to support these models has been found." (Wikipedia, Fifth force)

The Muon g-2 anomaly in Fermilab does not prove the fifth force's existence. But the anomaly or wobbling trajectory in those muons means that something brought unexpected energy into the particle accelerator. And one explanation can be that some neutrons decay in the particle accelerator. When neutrons or some other particle decay. 

That releases energy. Sometimes it is suggested that maybe those muons hit the neutrinos. Or some other muon or some other short-term particle released an unexpected photon into the particle accelerator. The fact is that the Muon g-2 anomaly didn’t rewrite physics. But it restarted discussions of the fifth force. 

There are four other fundamental interactions. 

-gravity

-electromagnetism

-weak interaction

-strong interaction

All other than gravity have pushing and pulling effects. So, could the hypothetical fifth force have only a pushing effect? 

There are theoretical models. That there is a fifth force in nature. That force closes all other fundamental forces or fundamental interactions inside it. 

If we consider that the fifth force arises within the neutron, could the rotation of two quarks around one quark generate that force? So those three quarks absorb a quantum field from the spin axis and throw it onto the neutron's equator. At that moment, a quantum shadow is created at the points of the surfaces of the neutron's whisk-like structure. In other words, the shadow enters the neutron from the direction of the spin axis and exits from its equator. 

In that model quarks that orbit each other and the quark middle of the system form the electromagnetic, or quantum point that puts two down quarks to orbit one up quark. In that model, the lower energy up quark makes an electromagnetic, or quantum vacuum in the neutron. Those two up quarks form the quantum field that hits the up quark. The up quark forms an energy beam that transports energy out from that structure. That energy transfer forms energy at low pressure that keeps neutrons in their form. 

The orbiting quarks harness energy from the quantum field inside the neutron. That keeps the neutron in its form. But sooner or later, the neutron will decay. The existence of a neutron remains for about 18 seconds if it comes out from an atom. And there is a possibility that neutron decay is caused by the fifth force. We know that if a fifth force exists, that force is wave movement. And the thing that determines the fifth force wavelength is the size of the structure that sends that wave movement. 

That thing means that the fifth force can be the force between electron shells, or orbitals and neutrons. The key element in the fish force is this: there is something that researchers have not noticed before. One possibility is that the force between proton and electron is different from the force between neutron and electron. That means the fifth force can be the force that has only a pushing effect. And there are models where there is only one natural force in the universe. 

The Grand Unified Theory, GUT theory suggests that all four fundamental interactions are the same. In the same way, all elementary particles are the same. And the thing that differentiates the electron from the quarks is the energy level. And in that model bosons are only wave movement. The size of the particles determines the wavelength of wave movement. So all bosons are virtual particles, and the only thing that moves is wave movement. That theory is one of the most fascinating models that is made of the universe. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Fiber drones are deadly tools.

FPV drones are deadly tools in the Ukrainian war. The Russian-developed optical drone is a fiber controlled which makes it immune to regular ECM systems. The control transmission travels through optical fibers, allowing the drone to operate in heavy jamming environments. Thin optical fiber makes it possible for a drone can operate 20-30 kilometers away from the operator. Dropping drones with regular ECM is not possible. So they can beat any jamming. 

But things like higher-power radio and microwave systems that burn those drone’s electrics can be the answer. The fiber-controlled drone is theoretically easy to destroy if somebody finds the control fiber and cuts it. If the defender finds the fiber normal scissors would be enough to cut the fiber. And one answer for that deadly problem can be a drone that is equipped with wire cutters. 

But the real answer can be the laser system that engineers can mount to cars and other vehicles. The laser ray can cut the optical fiber quite easily. The industrial laser can just grope the drone and its environment. And if the optical fiber is cut the control signals cannot reach the drone. The laser system can include lidar and weapon systems, or modes. When the system is in a surveillance model, it uses a large cone. And when the system cuts those optical fibers and destroys drones it uses the cutting laser beam. 

There is a theoretical possibility that if the opponent system can search and locate the command wire benefiting the light that is leaked from that fiber, that system can follow the optical fiber using a light amplifier. That leaked light can make it possible for the counter system to send drones to locate the operators or the drone support station where the optical signal has its origin. But that requires quite expensive tools. And the optical fiber must also leak light. 

Drones are a good example of how the improved weapon faces an improved defender. In early war large-size drones that were like remote-controlled combat aircraft ruled the battlefield. But the R&D work brought smaller, and cheaper FPV-kamikaze drones to the battlefield. The ECM, or electronic countermeasure signals made those drones useless. And the remote-control systems are easy targets for artillery that can locate them using their radio signals. The ECM can cut those signals easily. 

So the answer was the wire-controlled drones that were and are immune against ECM. The new solution could be a laser weapon that cuts those command wires. The next step is the independently operating drones that can search and attack targets independently. Those drones are tools that are cheap. And cheap prices make their advance fast. Drones along with the AI will revolutionize warfare. AI is cheap to use. If the algorithm is well done, operators must only load necessary programs to them. 

https://www.ga.com/advanced-weapons-technology/laser-weapon-systems

https://kyivindependent.com/as-russias-fiber-optic-drones-flood-the-battlefield-ukraine-is-racing-to-catch-up/

https://www.sustainability-times.com/energy/laser-powered-weapons-are-here-u-s-military-abandons-cables-in-radical-shift-that-could-revolutionize-battlefield-tech-forever/

https://www.twz.com/news-features/inside-ukraines-fiber-optic-drone-war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_weapon

Do it Yourself, DIY hobbyist-made homemade, portable lasers that can melt even steel.

Illustration of a groundbreaking 250-watt handheld laser device created by YouTuber Styropyro. Image generated by AI. (SustainAbility Times, “I Built a Laser from Hell”: YouTuber Unleashes World’s Strongest Handheld Beam That Instantly Melts Metal and Ignites Anything)

Above: (SustainAbility Times, “I Built a Laser from Hell”: YouTuber Unleashes World’s Strongest Handheld Beam That Instantly Melts Metal and Ignites Anything)

Laser is not a toy. One single laser LED can burn the paper. In the second film, you see that the 1W laser LED can put newspaper on fire. But, the most powerful hand-held, homemade laser can make much more. The YouTuber named Drake Anthony made that thing. And its introduced in many media pages. The first film is about that, the most powerful hand-held laser. 

The 250 W laser uses LED-based technology. That makes it possible to make portable lightweight, high-power laser systems. That laser can melt steel and those things make them very dangerous in the wrong hands. The laser system that shoots a laser beam through the laser lead-made laser beams binds that energy into those beams. This effect is known as the maser effect. 

The requirement for that thing is that laser rays that come from the bottom of the system are stronger than beams that come from its sides. Another way to make that system is to use high-power holograms. Those high-power or high-energy holograms inject energy into that laser beam. And that can raise its energy level to higher than the creator predicts. Another way is to aim multiple laser- LEDs at the same point. 

In the wrong hands, those portable systems can be dangerous. They can be used to cut electric wires. And if they are aimed at things like aircraft. They can scratch to the wing. That means those systems can be dangerous and at this time dangerous means both purpose and non-purpose damages that the high-power laser rays can cause. A single laser LED that injects energy into organs like eyes or skin can cause deep burning injuries. And that makes those systems dangerous.

Above: The most powerful hand-held laser.  

Above: 1W laser LED burns newspaper. 

When we think about military applications, high-power portable lasers can make a similar revolution as drones. The ability to interconnect laser communication lasers and laser weapons makes it possible to create systems. They can also destroy drones and other targets. Laser systems can drill holes in cannons and engines. And that makes them ideal for sabotage. 

If multiple drones aim laser beams at one point, that can destroy even large, and well-armored targets. Those lasers can cooperate with drones. If the drone has a mirror and the laser beam is aimed at it, that system makes it possible to shoot laser beams around the corner. The mirror drone that hovers above the battlefield can aim those laser beams over the hills and other blockage. 

The fact is that laser weapons are also deadly tools. If somebody uses a laser rifle as an assassination tool, there is no bullet that nobody can compare like police normally make in gunshot cases.  High-power laser rays that are shot at the water balloon can cause extremely powerful explosions when they cause sudden vaporization of water. 

The power of that explosion depends on how powerful that laser ray is. And how fast it can transfer its energy to that water. If that evaporation happens very fast. That can create a powerful pressure effect that can damage things. That is around it. So that makes it an effective stun gun. 

https://www.sustainability-times.com/energy/i-built-a-laser-from-hell-youtuber-unleashes-worlds-strongest-handheld-beam-that-instantly-melts-metal-and-ignites-anything/

What happens when we get AGI?

What does AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) mean? That is the extension of the large language models, LLMs, that can control every data network in the world. Or the system can control physical tools that are connected under their dome. Normal LLM has its domain. The domain is like a state that involves certain actions. Drone control is one domain, and home appliances are one domain. Those domains can have multiple subdomains. The AGI interconnects those domains under one dome or one entirety. So how far are we from that model? 

The answer is more complicated than we can imagine. We can think that the LLM can control things like microwave ovens, but for controlling those tools the LLM requires a socket that it can use to adjust microwave ovens. So the man-shaped robot can use a microwave oven, or the other version is that the home appliances are equipped with a control system that the AI can use to command it. 

When we connect new things under AI control we can face the same thing as when we try to learn to use some new systems. When we buy something new like a microwave oven, we must learn how to use it. In the same way, the AI must learn to use those equipment. And we have two versions for making that thing. 

To use any tool the AI requires a model that it can use in that operation. The model can be in the central server that runs the AI. But where does that server get the model? That is the point. The operator can teach the AI to use the microwave oven as well as the drone. But the system that is connected to the AI can also involve that model. Things like quadcopters must involve programs that control the rotor’s positions. In those cases the operative model is in the robot, or some other thing. The LLM gives orders to robots where they must travel. 

Then the robot can use its internal systems to navigate and move to the location. But orders for autonomic operations are coming from the central systems. This kind of network-based solution is easier for programmers. In those solutions, every single machine that is connected under the LLM domain has its own operational model. The system is modular and each module is independently programmed. 

Basically, if we think that AGI is the tool that just connects multiple devices under one domain, we could do that thing immediately. We can use man-shaped robots that can do almost everything. But the key word is “almost”. 

 Let’s return to the microwave oven. The reason why it’s hard to make that precise thing is the lack of standard user interfaces. The robot must learn to use every single microwave oven independently. That means it must make an independent model for each microwave oven. If there is a system where we can put seconds and minutes separately, the systems where there are only minutes in the timer are not the same. We learn that difference in minutes. But for robots, we must make an independent model of how to adjust the timer. 

Many systems in the world are so easy to use that nobody has wasted time creating standards for them. Easy systems are easy for people, but then we must think about things like the microwave oven. There are button- or toggle timers and that makes them hard to learn. For robots and AI the difficulty is this in the fact all microwave oven models require their independent model of how to use them. 

The robot must connect images from the user manual to the microwave oven’s interface. There is a possibility that if the system does not learn independently the “teacher” or programmer takes an image of the front panel, and then puts the buttons in the right places. Then the AI can learn the rest of the task from the user manual. 

The new technology gives supervision to people.

"Infrared-seeing contacts are here. Transparent, power-free, and wearable, they let users perceive near-infrared light in color, opening doors for superhuman sight and enhanced visual communication." (ScitechDaily, From Sci-Fi to Superpower: These Contacts Let You See in the Dark With Your Eyes Closed)

*****************************************************

Imagine slipping on a pair of contact lenses and suddenly being able to see infrared light—without any bulky equipment or even a battery. That’s now a reality thanks to breakthrough lenses developed by scientists that convert invisible infrared into visible colors.

Mice tested with the lenses navigated away from infrared light, while humans could perceive flickering codes and light directions. The lenses even work better with eyes closed, thanks to superior penetration of infrared light.

Infrared Vision Through Contact Lenses

Scientists have developed futuristic contact lenses that let both humans and mice see infrared light by converting it into visible light. These lenses work very differently from bulky night vision goggles. 

They don’t need any power source and allow users to view multiple types of infrared wavelengths at once. Because they’re transparent, you can see both regular light and infrared light together. Amazingly, the infrared vision actually worked better when users had their eyes closed." 

(ScitechDaily, From Sci-Fi to Superpower: These Contacts Let You See in the Dark With Your Eyes Closed)

*****************************************************

The new contact lenses allow a person to see in the dark while eyes are closed. Those contact lenses give an IR vision for the user. That means a person can see in absolute darkness. 

That ability makes it possible to operate and see in the dark. Those lenses give a person the ability to see thermal objects, which is a good ability for firemen, police, and military personnel. 

Intelligent contact lenses are problematic systems for their power supply. Those systems require very small and powerful batteries that a person can switch or load easily. Maybe biological systems like bacteria that produce electricity can give answers to that problem. The answer can be the system that produces electricity from salt in the shell of the eye. 

Intelligent contact lenses and sunglasses can give the ability to interact with the internet. The system can have cameras in the frames or in the middle of the lens. That means the "lens" is the screen where data from multiple sensors and information tools are fusion into that screen. The system can show what happens in front of that user. 

Then it can collect the data from surveillance cameras and the route to the target. Things like airborne drones can give backup information for the system. This kind of system can also connect with the eye retina implants. There are two ways to make the robot eye interact with brains. The neuro-implanted microchips can be installed in the optic nerve. 

It can also be put in the optical lobe of the brain. That kind of system can restore vision to people. The synthetic retina implant, CCD chip can get the electricity that it needs from the optic lobe. Then it can communicate with the brain using wireless or wired communication. 

And genetic engineering is the new tool. 

Genetic engineering makes it possible to make synthetic biological eyes for humans. Those artificial organs can also replace animal tests for chemicals and cosmetics. Artificial eyes with communication ability with computers can tell how painful some sprays are without harming animals. 

But genetically engineered cells can make it possible to restore vision to people using cloned retina cells. Then the genetically engineered cells can be used to replace the neurons. Those cells can make the bridge over damaged axons. And then the programmed DNA can turn those cells that make chains into neurons. 

That kind of therapy that is based on genetic manipulation can be the permission of tomorrow. The ability to control the genomes makes it possible to create things like eagle's, or cat's eyes. Which cells surface antigens that fit certain people. Those organs can give the person super abilities. Theoretically, they are as easy to transplant to humans. As regular eye transplants. 

https://scitechdaily.com/from-sci-fi-to-superpower-these-contacts-let-you-see-in-the-dark-with-your-eyes-closed/

Genetic engineering is the ultimate tool for people

Genetic engineering brings new species in front of us. The genetically engineered spiders that create silk that glows red in the dark is the brand new thing in the world of genetic engineering. Genetically engineered species can make many things that are impossible for regular technology. There is the possibility to create insects that deliver vaccines. The mosquitos that carry deadly malaria and other diseases can also carry vaccines. The idea is that. 

The vaccine is made in the engineered mosquito's salivary gland, and it helps the immune system detect malaria parasites better than without that vaccine. The malaria vaccine can be the shell antigens of the malaria parasites and the immune booster that causes an immune reaction against those antigens. 

This thing can be a very interesting way to use genetically engineered species in areas. Where there are no vaccine styluses. Or people are hard to reach. 

"The first genetic editing in spiders with CRISPR‐Cas yields colorful silk" (Phys.org/The first genetic editing in spiders with CRISPR‐Cas yields colorful silk)

But then we can go to the biorobots like microchip-controlled bugs. Same way. Microchips can control bugs. Those things can control things like spiders. The remotely controlled spiders can make the silk canvas.  But then we can think, about what remote-controlled spiders like black widows can make in wrong hands.

Genetical engineering makes it possible to create things like mosquitos, wasps, and bees that produce the same poison as the black widow. Those things are extremely dangerous in the wrong hands. And microchip controlled bees and other bugs can attack people. Genetically engineered parasites can create things like tetradotoxin. Which makes it possible to create human robots. 

The most futuristic versions of biotechnology are beyond your wildest dreams and they are worse than your worst nightmares. 

Genetic engineering makes it possible to create the most interesting versions of the hypothetical intelligent bugs. Those creatures can be spiders spider silk involves bacteria that can transmit those spider's nervous signals to each other. 

But then we can remember Joseph Stalin's idea of "monkey soldiers", or "dog soldiers. The soldiers with monkey brains. The idea is that the dog soldier follows precisely the orders that it gets. The microchips in the brain control that creature. The control antenna can look like a helmet or some kind of metal bandanna. 

The first experiments with this bizarre idea were made by Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov. Ivanov tried to transplant the dog's head to a monkey's body. That person tried to create a human-monkey hybrid. Brain implants and genetic engineering make it possible to create real-life monkey soldiers. Sometimes Stalin and Hitler called those hypothetical soldiers whose brains are like dogs' brains and who follow all orders that they have. 

Monkey- or dog soldier is the term that means the soldier or creature that can only follow orders and doesn't think themselves. The brain-implanted genetically engineered soldiers can act as biorobots. The monkey-soldier can be like some kind of "predator" from the horror-action movie, where masked alien creature hunts people on Earth. The idea is that this kind of creature can have a strong body. But the brain-implanted microchips can control that creature's body. 

https://phys.org/news/2025-05-genetic-spiders-crisprcas-yields-silk.html

https://interestingengineering.com/science/gene-edited-spider-red-silk

https://scitechdaily.com/shocking-discovery-scientists-discover-organism-that-act-like-living-electrical-wires/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Ivanov

The Russian space weapons cause worries.

"The 'Cosmos 2553' satellite was blasted through the atmosphere atop a Soyuz-2 rocket from Russia 's Plesetsk Cosmodrome in February 2022" (DailyMail)

The Russian and Soviet space weapon projects started in the 1960s. At that time the Soviet military tested ways to destroy enemy satellites using kinetic weapons. U.S. and Soviets tested the way to shut down enemy defense using the EMP pulses. The EMP pulse satellite can be the nuclear bomb that detonates over enemy territory. 

That system destroys the electronics immediately. In the 1962 nuclear test "Starfish Prime" demonstrated the power of those EMP weapons. The U.S. military detonated a 1,4 Mt. thermonuclear weapon in space over the City of Honolulu. That nuclear detonator shut down all electricity from the city and launched burglary alarms. That test was made in the 1960s when the electronics were as vulnerable to the EMP as they are today. 

X-37B

One of the problems with space nukes is how to return them to the ground. If one nuclear weapon-armed satellite gets out of control and returns to the atmosphere without control. That system can deliver plutonium all over the land. The system can be a miniature shuttle like X37B or some of its Chinese variants. Rockets can transport those systems to the orbiter. And wait for orders to attack. 

The miniature shuttle acts as a super kamikaze drone that can destroy targets on the ground. The hit angle that those systems can use can be surprising. The low hit angle causes trouble for defense. That system can return to a normal airfield. For service and repairments. The miniature shuttle can also carry ASAT weapons like kinetic energy systems and lasers. 

The ASAT satellites can have the "Kill system", like lasers or kinetic energy weapons. Or operators can drive them to collide with other satellites. The ASAT system can also carry kinetic systems. Those systems can involve steel balls. That is packed into the rocket's nose. When a rocket releases those steel balls. They can fill the orbiter with debris. That makes it impossible to use it. When those steel balls orbit in the opposite direction to the targeted satellites and impact them, that impact destroys those targets immediately. 

The Soviet military had three main types of space weapons programs. 

1) ASAT, Anti-Satellite weapon projects. 

2) ABM, Anti-Ballistic missile projects. 

3) FOBS, Fractional orbital bombardment systems. 

The FOBS involves two types of subsystems. 

A) The bombardment system that means bombs or missiles that can be launched from orbital satellites. 

B) The EMP Weapons. Which means the satellite carries a nuclear weapon. That detonates in the satellite. Unlike in the movie "Goldeneye," the satellite doesn't necessarily remove its shell before it detonates in the trajectory. That means those satellites whose mission is to destroy other satellites and enemy electronics can detonate almost without warning. In real life, those systems require the trigger signal. 

That command center cannot send signals straight to another side of the world. It must use the chain of the communication satellites. Or hide the command system in the embassy or establish a control station on another side of the world. So, could the Russian SIGINT station at Lourdes, Cuba have some role with the EMP weapon systems? Also, the command center can be on ships. 

All of those programs involved space, aircraft, ship, and land-based kinetic energy, laser, and radio-wave-based systems. The mission of those systems was to disturb and knock out enemy (NATO) satellites. Soviets used land-based lasers against the low-flying recon satellites by pointing laser weapons at them. 

And laser systems disturb those satellite cameras. The purpose of those lasers was to blind satellites. When the contract of the space demilitarization was made that contract prohibited weapons from space. But it's possible that the Soviets and maybe some other countries continued those weapon tests in silence. 

The case Kosmos 954 was a satellite that fell to Canada in 1977. The recon satellite used a nuclear reactor as a power source. And that caused questions about the purpose of that satellite. Officially Kosmos 954 was a radar recon satellite that needed that power for its radar. But it's possible that the Kosmos 954 could have some kind of electromagnetic pulse, or EMP weapon. The EMP weapon that bases the high-power radio impulse, and double pole radio waves that cause electric arc to other satellites can damage other satellites. The question is: Was that nuclear reactor used for that kind of weapon? 

Soviets also had a program called ALMAZ. That program consisted of space stations and satellites. It's possible that some of those satellites and space stations included the ASAT role. Soviets also tested miniature shuttles like the MiG-105 "Spiral". Those miniature shuttles could be used against satellites. But those small vehicles can also operate as "supercruise missiles" or hypersonic missiles. 

Miniature shuttles can drop normal bombs that are equipped with heat shields. Or they can carry internal nuclear weapons, that the system detonates in the right altitude. The shuttle can act as a super kamikaze drone that slides against its targets like military bases or cities. 

The new Kosmos 2553 causes questions. 

The unusual orbital trajectory tells us that there is something. That should not be in that satellite. There is a possibility that the Kosmos 2553 could be some kind of test bed for the ASAT or FOBS satellite. The satellite can detonate internal nuclear weapons at the orbiter. That detonation causes an EMP-impulse that can destroy electronics all around the world. 

The EMP weapon that suddenly detonates over the USA can shut down its electric supply and cause critical damage to the military and civil aircraft. The Kosmos 2553 causes a critical need to put the anti satellite systems in the orbiter. And that accelerates the arms race in space. 

The ground-based systems do not have enough time to react if the Kosmos 2553 type satellite suddenly detonates over the USA; that system can critically damage the U.S. or Europe's defense. 

The nuclear weapon that detonates at the front of the missile mass-raid can also detonate and damage many of those missiles. The EMP satellite can have two roles. To destroy opponents' missiles when they rise over the atmosphere and suppress the enemy's ability to use air defense. 

The new problem that we should consider is nuclear air-to-air missiles. The nuclear warhead gives those missiles the multirole capacity. The aircraft can use those small nuclear missiles against all targets. The nuclear air-to-air missile can destroy ships, troops, and cities as well as destroy aerial targets. 

Those nuclear missiles are suitable for space weapons. The spaceborne satellite that looks like "Katyusha" rocket mortars can carry those missiles. And that gives that kind of system an ultimate strike ability. Russians say that they will give funds for those kinds of weapon systems that can be dangerous against all other things in space, land, and sea. The space-launched nuclear missile can destroy submarines if its warhead detonates under the sea. 

https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/is-russias-cosmos-2553-satellite-a-test-for-a-future-orbital-nuclear-weapon/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14160829/Putins-nuclear-star-wars-threat-West-Kremlins-mysterious-Cosmos-2553-satellite-fitted-dummy-warhead-forerunner-nuke-wipe-rival-spacecraft-cause-chaos-Earth.html

https://interestingengineering.com/military/russian-space-weapon-satellite-failure

https://www.twz.com/air/russia-fielding-new-nuclear-armed-air-to-air-missiles-us-intel

 https://www.twz.com/space/putting-missile-interceptors-in-space-critical-to-defending-u-s-citizens-space-force-boss

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_954

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

Images: DailyMail. 

The one-pixel camera is a strange alternative to regular cameras.

"Kobe University YONEDA Naru and his team could adapt their setup to construct a microscope that can record a holographic movie through a light-scattering object — a mouse skull to be precise." (Interesting engineering, Tiny 1-pixel camera films holographic 3D movies beyond visible light, through objects)

In this text, the "camera" includes digital image-remastering tools from DMD to a computer that creates the image. So, the computer and AI are part of this system. 

Single- or one-pixel imaging systems are strange but effective ways to observe small structures. The single- or one-pixel CCD systems can make 3D images of small objects. The size of the pixel determines the camera's accuracy. Small pixels give higher accuracy. The thing that makes this kind of system effective in nanotechnology is that the observation system itself doesn't transfer energy to the object. And that doesn't bring artifacts, or non-controlled effects to the system. 

The tiny one-pixel camera can be a new and powerful alternative to CCD cameras. The one-pixel camera uses only one pixel to make images of 3D structures. The size of that pixel determines the accuracy of the camera. The system uses singe-pixel imaging which is one version of computer imaging. 

The large pixel means that the system is less accurate than a system with a small pixel. And if the system uses a one-pixel version of the megapixel-class CCD camera. It can make images of tiny 3D structures. 

"Schematic of a single-pixel camera using a DMD. The transmitted light (white) from the sample (blue) is modulated by the DMD and collected by a single-pixel detector. (Wikipedia, Single-pixel imaging)

A 3D single-pixel imaging. 

"A pulsed laser uniformly illuminates a DMD, used to provide structured illumination onto a scene, and the back-scattered light is collected onto a photodiode. The measured light intensities are used in a 3D reconstruction algorithm to reconstruct both depth and reflectivity images." (InterestingEnginering, Tiny 1-pixel camera films holographic 3D movies beyond visible light, through objects)

The system requires a digital micromirror device, DMD, and mirror systems that aim light at the system. The system requires light. And that means it brings a little bit of extra energy to the system. However, the need for energy is much lower than in the scanning systems. 

In that kind of system, the developer must only separate one pixel from the CCD chip. When a one-pixel camera makes images, it just scans the surface. The pixel moves back and forth. Or that pixel can be at rotational toboggan, which allows it to move fast. The system can turn that pixel from one direction into another. 

Making the image of the object. When we think about the ball-shaped system there is a possibility that when the scanner moves around the axle there is a switch that cuts electricity from the pixel, when it's in a certain direction. The system can have three positions. The small-area photographing, and 180 and 360 degrees scanning images. 

The other version is the system where the CCD camera's pixels are connected separately with the microchip. Then the system just connects the pixels to the computer one by one. That gives the system the ability to do virtual movement.

That is possible if the CCD camera's pixels are connected to the computer separately so the system can transform the CCD chip into a one-pixel camera. In that kind of system, the system benefits the CCD chip's ability to handle every pixel as an independently operating camera. 

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/1-pixel-camera-films-holographic-3d-movies

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12010

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-pixel_imaging