Mathematics, geometry, and quantum.

In the image in this text is an image of lupine and image of a quantum experiment there is tested Landrauer's principle. “Landauer's principle is a physical principle pertaining to a lower theoretical limit of energy consumption of computation. It holds that an irreversible change in information stored in a computer, such as merging two computational paths, dissipates a minimum amount of heat to its surroundings. It is hypothesized that energy consumption below this lower bound would require the development of reversible computing. The principle was first proposed by Rolf Landauer in 1961.” (Wikipedia, Landauer's principle)

Both the flower and those quantum fields form the tower. And the remarkable thing is that those quantum fields form a similar structure as a series of coils that send radiation from their sides. That kind of quantum tower can send information to the receiving coils or layers if they are against each other. Same way a radio antenna transmits information from the points where the Hall effect forms the plate-shaped expansion into the electromagnetic (quantum) field between atoms. 

"Quantum magnetometers are breaking barriers in magnetic sensing — but are they really quantum? A new study digs into how far these devices can go and what defines their quantum nature. Credit: SciTechDaily.com"(ScitechDaily, Quantum Sensors That Hear Magnetic Whispers – And Push Physics to Its Limit). Those sensors could form a tower that can scan quite a large area. 

Quantum magnetometers can detect incredibly small changes in magnetic fields by tapping into the strange and powerful features of quantum physics. These devices rely on the discrete nature and coherence of quantum particles—behaviors that give them a major edge over classical sensors. But how far can their sensitivity go? And what actually makes a magnetometer “quantum?” (ScitechDaily, Quantum Sensors That Hear Magnetic Whispers – And Push Physics to Its Limit)

Those fields form when an electromagnetic wave travels between atoms.  When that wave hits an atom's quantum field it causes a wave. That wave or resistance makes it possible that the system can press information into the sides of the antenna.  When we think about those Hall fields and those flowers, we can imagine a situation where those flowers could send chemical signals from their flowers to another flower. That thing is not proven. But the lupine flowers can act as models for directed radio transmitters that send coherent radio signals to the receiver. 

The second image introduces the model of the quantum fields around quantum sensors. Those quantum fields allow those sensors to sense things that were unable to detect before. When we think about things like quantum computers, erasing information is also important. If we can trap wave movement into the bubble, we can erase that information by pressing wave movement into a straight position. 

We can see that the same forms repeat in nature. The image from the Landrauer’s principle has a similar form with flowering plants. And that causes an interesting question. Can we someday calculate things like quantum fields' form in situations where some high-power energy impulse hits them. If we think that the quantum tower is similar in all sizes of quantum systems, we can make the new types of quantum systems that are more sensitive than ever before.  

There is a possibility that the quantum sensor looks like the quantum tower where the electrons or photons hover between objects and those quantum fields. When we make superposition and entanglement we must know everything from the system. We must predict things like FRBs and other changes in the power of electromagnetic fields. 

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-approach-probing-landauer-principle-quantum.html

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-sensors-that-hear-magnetic-whispers-and-push-physics-to-its-limit/

https://scitechdaily.com/the-quantum-price-of-forgetting-scientists-finally-measure-the-energy-cost-of-deleting-information/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_effect

Can the fifth force hide in neutrons?

 

"In physics, a fifth force refers to a hypothetical fundamental interaction (also known as fundamental force) beyond the four known interactions in nature: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear forces. Some speculative theories have proposed a fifth force to explain various anomalous observations that do not fit existing theories. The specific characteristics of a putative fifth force depend on which hypothesis is being advanced. No evidence to support these models has been found." (Wikipedia, Fifth force)

The Muon g-2 anomaly in Fermilab does not prove the fifth force's existence. But the anomaly or wobbling trajectory in those muons means that something brought unexpected energy into the particle accelerator. And one explanation can be that some neutrons decay in the particle accelerator. When neutrons or some other particle decay. 

That releases energy. Sometimes it is suggested that maybe those muons hit the neutrinos. Or some other muon or some other short-term particle released an unexpected photon into the particle accelerator. The fact is that the Muon g-2 anomaly didn’t rewrite physics. But it restarted discussions of the fifth force. 

There are four other fundamental interactions. 

-gravity

-electromagnetism

-weak interaction

-strong interaction

All other than gravity have pushing and pulling effects. So, could the hypothetical fifth force have only a pushing effect? 

There are theoretical models. That there is a fifth force in nature. That force closes all other fundamental forces or fundamental interactions inside it. 

If we consider that the fifth force arises within the neutron, could the rotation of two quarks around one quark generate that force? So those three quarks absorb a quantum field from the spin axis and throw it onto the neutron's equator. At that moment, a quantum shadow is created at the points of the surfaces of the neutron's whisk-like structure. In other words, the shadow enters the neutron from the direction of the spin axis and exits from its equator. 

In that model quarks that orbit each other and the quark middle of the system form the electromagnetic, or quantum point that puts two down quarks to orbit one up quark. In that model, the lower energy up quark makes an electromagnetic, or quantum vacuum in the neutron. Those two up quarks form the quantum field that hits the up quark. The up quark forms an energy beam that transports energy out from that structure. That energy transfer forms energy at low pressure that keeps neutrons in their form. 

The orbiting quarks harness energy from the quantum field inside the neutron. That keeps the neutron in its form. But sooner or later, the neutron will decay. The existence of a neutron remains for about 18 seconds if it comes out from an atom. And there is a possibility that neutron decay is caused by the fifth force. We know that if a fifth force exists, that force is wave movement. And the thing that determines the fifth force wavelength is the size of the structure that sends that wave movement. 

That thing means that the fifth force can be the force between electron shells, or orbitals and neutrons. The key element in the fish force is this: there is something that researchers have not noticed before. One possibility is that the force between proton and electron is different from the force between neutron and electron. That means the fifth force can be the force that has only a pushing effect. And there are models where there is only one natural force in the universe. 

The Grand Unified Theory, GUT theory suggests that all four fundamental interactions are the same. In the same way, all elementary particles are the same. And the thing that differentiates the electron from the quarks is the energy level. And in that model bosons are only wave movement. The size of the particles determines the wavelength of wave movement. So all bosons are virtual particles, and the only thing that moves is wave movement. That theory is one of the most fascinating models that is made of the universe. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Fiber drones are deadly tools.

FPV drones are deadly tools in the Ukrainian war. The Russian-developed optical drone is a fiber controlled which makes it immune to regular ECM systems. The control transmission travels through optical fibers, allowing the drone to operate in heavy jamming environments. Thin optical fiber makes it possible for a drone can operate 20-30 kilometers away from the operator. Dropping drones with regular ECM is not possible. So they can beat any jamming. 

But things like higher-power radio and microwave systems that burn those drone’s electrics can be the answer. The fiber-controlled drone is theoretically easy to destroy if somebody finds the control fiber and cuts it. If the defender finds the fiber normal scissors would be enough to cut the fiber. And one answer for that deadly problem can be a drone that is equipped with wire cutters. 

But the real answer can be the laser system that engineers can mount to cars and other vehicles. The laser ray can cut the optical fiber quite easily. The industrial laser can just grope the drone and its environment. And if the optical fiber is cut the control signals cannot reach the drone. The laser system can include lidar and weapon systems, or modes. When the system is in a surveillance model, it uses a large cone. And when the system cuts those optical fibers and destroys drones it uses the cutting laser beam. 

There is a theoretical possibility that if the opponent system can search and locate the command wire benefiting the light that is leaked from that fiber, that system can follow the optical fiber using a light amplifier. That leaked light can make it possible for the counter system to send drones to locate the operators or the drone support station where the optical signal has its origin. But that requires quite expensive tools. And the optical fiber must also leak light. 

Drones are a good example of how the improved weapon faces an improved defender. In early war large-size drones that were like remote-controlled combat aircraft ruled the battlefield. But the R&D work brought smaller, and cheaper FPV-kamikaze drones to the battlefield. The ECM, or electronic countermeasure signals made those drones useless. And the remote-control systems are easy targets for artillery that can locate them using their radio signals. The ECM can cut those signals easily. 

So the answer was the wire-controlled drones that were and are immune against ECM. The new solution could be a laser weapon that cuts those command wires. The next step is the independently operating drones that can search and attack targets independently. Those drones are tools that are cheap. And cheap prices make their advance fast. Drones along with the AI will revolutionize warfare. AI is cheap to use. If the algorithm is well done, operators must only load necessary programs to them. 

https://www.ga.com/advanced-weapons-technology/laser-weapon-systems

https://kyivindependent.com/as-russias-fiber-optic-drones-flood-the-battlefield-ukraine-is-racing-to-catch-up/

https://www.sustainability-times.com/energy/laser-powered-weapons-are-here-u-s-military-abandons-cables-in-radical-shift-that-could-revolutionize-battlefield-tech-forever/

https://www.twz.com/news-features/inside-ukraines-fiber-optic-drone-war

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_weapon

Do it Yourself, DIY hobbyist-made homemade, portable lasers that can melt even steel.

Illustration of a groundbreaking 250-watt handheld laser device created by YouTuber Styropyro. Image generated by AI. (SustainAbility Times, “I Built a Laser from Hell”: YouTuber Unleashes World’s Strongest Handheld Beam That Instantly Melts Metal and Ignites Anything)

Above: (SustainAbility Times, “I Built a Laser from Hell”: YouTuber Unleashes World’s Strongest Handheld Beam That Instantly Melts Metal and Ignites Anything)

Laser is not a toy. One single laser LED can burn the paper. In the second film, you see that the 1W laser LED can put newspaper on fire. But, the most powerful hand-held, homemade laser can make much more. The YouTuber named Drake Anthony made that thing. And its introduced in many media pages. The first film is about that, the most powerful hand-held laser. 

The 250 W laser uses LED-based technology. That makes it possible to make portable lightweight, high-power laser systems. That laser can melt steel and those things make them very dangerous in the wrong hands. The laser system that shoots a laser beam through the laser lead-made laser beams binds that energy into those beams. This effect is known as the maser effect. 

The requirement for that thing is that laser rays that come from the bottom of the system are stronger than beams that come from its sides. Another way to make that system is to use high-power holograms. Those high-power or high-energy holograms inject energy into that laser beam. And that can raise its energy level to higher than the creator predicts. Another way is to aim multiple laser- LEDs at the same point. 

In the wrong hands, those portable systems can be dangerous. They can be used to cut electric wires. And if they are aimed at things like aircraft. They can scratch to the wing. That means those systems can be dangerous and at this time dangerous means both purpose and non-purpose damages that the high-power laser rays can cause. A single laser LED that injects energy into organs like eyes or skin can cause deep burning injuries. And that makes those systems dangerous.

Above: The most powerful hand-held laser.  

Above: 1W laser LED burns newspaper. 

When we think about military applications, high-power portable lasers can make a similar revolution as drones. The ability to interconnect laser communication lasers and laser weapons makes it possible to create systems. They can also destroy drones and other targets. Laser systems can drill holes in cannons and engines. And that makes them ideal for sabotage. 

If multiple drones aim laser beams at one point, that can destroy even large, and well-armored targets. Those lasers can cooperate with drones. If the drone has a mirror and the laser beam is aimed at it, that system makes it possible to shoot laser beams around the corner. The mirror drone that hovers above the battlefield can aim those laser beams over the hills and other blockage. 

The fact is that laser weapons are also deadly tools. If somebody uses a laser rifle as an assassination tool, there is no bullet that nobody can compare like police normally make in gunshot cases.  High-power laser rays that are shot at the water balloon can cause extremely powerful explosions when they cause sudden vaporization of water. 

The power of that explosion depends on how powerful that laser ray is. And how fast it can transfer its energy to that water. If that evaporation happens very fast. That can create a powerful pressure effect that can damage things. That is around it. So that makes it an effective stun gun. 

https://www.sustainability-times.com/energy/i-built-a-laser-from-hell-youtuber-unleashes-worlds-strongest-handheld-beam-that-instantly-melts-metal-and-ignites-anything/

What happens when we get AGI?

What does AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) mean? That is the extension of the large language models, LLMs, that can control every data network in the world. Or the system can control physical tools that are connected under their dome. Normal LLM has its domain. The domain is like a state that involves certain actions. Drone control is one domain, and home appliances are one domain. Those domains can have multiple subdomains. The AGI interconnects those domains under one dome or one entirety. So how far are we from that model? 

The answer is more complicated than we can imagine. We can think that the LLM can control things like microwave ovens, but for controlling those tools the LLM requires a socket that it can use to adjust microwave ovens. So the man-shaped robot can use a microwave oven, or the other version is that the home appliances are equipped with a control system that the AI can use to command it. 

When we connect new things under AI control we can face the same thing as when we try to learn to use some new systems. When we buy something new like a microwave oven, we must learn how to use it. In the same way, the AI must learn to use those equipment. And we have two versions for making that thing. 

To use any tool the AI requires a model that it can use in that operation. The model can be in the central server that runs the AI. But where does that server get the model? That is the point. The operator can teach the AI to use the microwave oven as well as the drone. But the system that is connected to the AI can also involve that model. Things like quadcopters must involve programs that control the rotor’s positions. In those cases the operative model is in the robot, or some other thing. The LLM gives orders to robots where they must travel. 

Then the robot can use its internal systems to navigate and move to the location. But orders for autonomic operations are coming from the central systems. This kind of network-based solution is easier for programmers. In those solutions, every single machine that is connected under the LLM domain has its own operational model. The system is modular and each module is independently programmed. 

Basically, if we think that AGI is the tool that just connects multiple devices under one domain, we could do that thing immediately. We can use man-shaped robots that can do almost everything. But the key word is “almost”. 

 Let’s return to the microwave oven. The reason why it’s hard to make that precise thing is the lack of standard user interfaces. The robot must learn to use every single microwave oven independently. That means it must make an independent model for each microwave oven. If there is a system where we can put seconds and minutes separately, the systems where there are only minutes in the timer are not the same. We learn that difference in minutes. But for robots, we must make an independent model of how to adjust the timer. 

Many systems in the world are so easy to use that nobody has wasted time creating standards for them. Easy systems are easy for people, but then we must think about things like the microwave oven. There are button- or toggle timers and that makes them hard to learn. For robots and AI the difficulty is this in the fact all microwave oven models require their independent model of how to use them. 

The robot must connect images from the user manual to the microwave oven’s interface. There is a possibility that if the system does not learn independently the “teacher” or programmer takes an image of the front panel, and then puts the buttons in the right places. Then the AI can learn the rest of the task from the user manual.